The Great Reset: Necessary and urgent debate in UK Parliament – 'No country will cede any sovereignty to WHO.'

"Why does the WHO make false claims regarding proposals to seize states’ sovereignty?"

"It is impossible to consider either the pandemic treaty or the amendments to the international health regulations in isolation; they are two linked instruments of the WHO, and they need to be considered in parallel."

MP Andrew Bridgen speaks in parliament: "In referring to the WHO’s new pandemic agreement and the proposed amendments to the international health regulations currently being negotiated, the director general of the WHO has stated: 'No country will cede any sovereignty to WHO.' 

"His statements are clear, unequivocal, and also wholly inconsistent with the text he is referring to. I remind the Chamber that this is the unelected, unaccountable, non-taxpaying, and immune-from-prosecution-due-to-diplomatic-immunity director general of the WHO. All employees of the United Nations and the WHO enjoy those particular perks."

The video below is the speech from MP Philip Davies:

"At the debate in April, we were told by the then Minister that it is 'simply not the case' that 'the instrument will undermine UK sovereignty and give WHO powers over national public health measures'.—[Official Report, 17 April 2023; Vol. 731, c. 34WH.] 

"I think it is worth revisiting this question, because I am not clear how national and parliamentary sovereignty can be upheld if the proposals are agreed. I draw attention to draft new article 13A, which calls for member states to 'undertake to follow WHO’s recommendations' and to recognize the World Health Organization not as an organization under the control of countries, but rather as the 'coordinating authority of international public health response during public health Emergency of International Concern.'"

MP Mark Francois speaks "…among those amendments being negotiated I understand are 1) amendment to make with emergency guidance legally binding, currently their only advisory, on member states, 2) amendment which would empower the WHO director general singlehandedly to declare a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), given this unelected, unaccountable individual unprecedented levels of power to dictate UK Public Health policy and to restrict fundamental freedoms. …the proposed amendments could empower the WHO to issue requirements for the UK to mandate highly restrictive measure such as lockdowns, masks, quarantines, travel restriction, medication on individuals including vaccination once a PHEIC has been declared by the WHO itself."

MP Sir John Redwood: "…it would be a grave error for the Government to sign a treaty which gives away important powers over the future conduct of health policy. It is wrong to give to the WHO the sole power to decide when there is an emergency, and it is wrong to give away our powers of self-decision were such an emergency to be visited upon us."

More in the Dr. John Campbell video.