Scientific Research: Truth was forced to be redacted – 'Stunning act of scientific censorship.'

The paper is entitled "Covid-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign."

"This is a 20 week area we are studying so any delay in deaths would be an under reporting of mortality. If Pfizer had used the actual death dates in their emergency use application two additional vaccination subjects would have been included in the application. This discrepancy was crucial. All vaccinated subjects, (four of four) and half of the placebo deaths [deaths occurred after eventual vaccination] (two of four) were cardiac related [deaths]."

More in the Dr. Boz (Annette Bosworth, MD) video.

Stop the scientific discourse! Here's the link to Dr. Peter McCullough's Substack article on this redacted scientific paper.

"Publisher retracts valid, high quality, and widely read Cureus paper calling for the halt in Covid-19 vaccination." "This is the first-reviewed paper to provide an extensive analysis of Covid-19 mRNA vaccine trial data and post-injection injuries. The authors of the paper also called for a global moratorium on the vaccines." 

"This paper topped >330,000 views/read/downloads in a month as compared to an average Cureus-promoted paper which has only 2700 in a year. A rating of >9.2 is considered 'excellent' and 'groundbreaking' appropriately characterizing this extensively cited paper with 293 references (average paper has 30)."

The article also include Dr. M. Nathaniel Mead and Dr. Peter A. McCullough rebuttal against the eight false claims made by Tim Kersjes and Springer Nature.