The Great Reset: Socialist communist dream – UK's silent deal steals your money, your savings.

"The pattern's really clear with what they're doing. Your pensions, your savings, all these other wealth taxes that they're going to put on people. Even people who aren't wealthy, they're going to class people as wealthy. Meanwhile, the government is wasting huge fortunes on things that the people simply don't want and actually harm the people." 

One of the Globalist's policies is to destroy the middle class. Only the super rich of their kind will get to keep their wealth. More money will be taken away once CBDCs totally replaces fiat currency. "By 2030, you won't own anything and you'll be happy" does also include your bank accounts, your savings, your investments… not just your property such as your home.

More in the Neil McCoy-Ward video.

Here's a comment and a well analyze overview of the Globalist's agenda from @dmet5810. Well said. Note: Where can your run to? Every corner of the world will be affected by the Great Reset. It won't take long after the fall of the Western countries for the rest of the world to follow in quick succession. The whole world will be controlled by a global digital ID, CBDCs and a social credit score system.

Hi Neil. I'm just another Canadian living in exile. These are my thoughts...

In recent years, the entanglement between national governments and the World Economic Forum (WEF) has moved from quiet coordination to overt alignment — and with it, the erosion of democratic sovereignty and public trust has accelerated. What was once an organization for global dialogue among elites [it never was or is, WEF have a plan since day one in 1971, a multi-decade plan] has become a shadow policymaking body, and far too many governments have rolled over [all these governments are helmed by trained globalist agents or foreign agents, so it was very easy], surrendering the interests of their citizens in the name of "stakeholder capitalism" and "global resilience."

At the heart of the WEF’s agenda lies the centralization of control: over economies, digital identities, health policy, energy systems, and even individual behaviour. The government, rather than defending the nation against these unelected technocrats, has instead embraced their language, priorities, and framework — adopting top-down initiatives with little to no input from the very people they claim to serve.

Take, for example, the fetishization of "net zero" and ESG frameworks, which are being implemented not through democratic debate but via regulatory slight-of-hand. These policies often bypass parliamentary processes and impose burdensome costs on small businesses, farmers, and working-class communities — all while allowing multinational corporations, the real beneficiaries of WEF ideology, to capture new markets and evade real accountability. Carbon credits and green bonds don’t save the planet; they shift money and power upward, away from the public and toward private boardrooms and global bureaucrats.

The same pattern appears in the push for digital identity systems and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), both of which are being sold under the banner of convenience and innovation. In reality, they open the door to unprecedented surveillance and behavioural control. What the WEF calls "digital trust" is, in practice, a blueprint for technocratic oversight. Yet the government pushes forward, using fear and crises as cover to implement systems that the public neither asked for nor meaningfully consented to.

This creeping authoritarianism is made all the worse by the stunning arrogance of its proponents. The WEF’s annual Davos summit — a veritable masquerade ball of billionaires, unelected officials, and self-anointed saviours — serves as the ideological incubator for policies that governments later adopt as if they were their own. Meanwhile, elected representatives act as if national interests are too provincial, too parochial, to matter in the new world order. They speak the language of “global challenges” while ignoring local needs.

Most damning of all is the utter lack of transparency. These policies are not subject to rigorous public debate. They are not evaluated for their impact on civil liberties or long-term social cohesion. Instead, they are ushered in by white papers, pilot programs, and quiet memos, hidden beneath layers of NGO partnerships and private-public alliances — the very architecture of unaccountable governance [this was set up decades ago].

In aligning so closely with the WEF’s agenda, the government has betrayed its foundational role: to serve the people, not manage them on behalf of international elites [foreign entities, foreign organizations]. This is not partnership — it’s subservience. It is the outsourcing of democratic responsibility to a class of technocrats who, for all their data and credentials, remain fundamentally disconnected from the human consequences of their ambitions.

Until the government remembers that it derives its legitimacy from the consent of the governed — not the applause of Davos — it will continue to drift into authoritarianism wrapped in the language of progress. And the public, waking up too slowly, will find themselves increasingly ruled, not represented.

(My input: square brackets for clarity, underlined is for emphasis.)

@mrwpg: "Equity is Orwellian speak for inequality, diversity = conformity, inclusivity = exclusion of dissenters."