Scientific Research: PCR tests had 86-90% false-positives – Covid-19 was massively over diagnosed and it turned the world upside down.

A German scientific study conducted between March 2020 and January 2023 used 90% of the PCR test data and correlated that with the serological mass tests for IgG antibodies performed on the same people. The result shows "14% of the people that tested positive for the PCR went on to develop the immunoglobulin type G's in the correct time frame, the two or three weeks after the positive PCR test. 14% did. That means 86% didn't."

Even the inventor of the PCR test had said during the pandemic that the device is not reliable and should not be used for testing the Covid-19 virus.

"Individuals whose PCR tests require CT values above 30 are commonly not to be considered infectious, whereas in practice, many tests were conducted with CT values up to 40. [However] PCR assay produced positive results on water controls at cycle threshold (CT) values between 36 and 38."

A point to note: The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine are among the many medical journals that are heavily funded by the big Pharma companies, such as Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., and Bayer. During the Covid-19 pandemic, many medical journals were told by big Pharma not to publish any scientific papers that show the vaccines in a negative light.

"How did they get it so wrong? No one's saying it was deliberate, but how did they make mistakes of such magnitude? How could we give informed consent based on such erroneous information?"

More in the Dr. John Campbell video.