New research paper from Stanford, UCLA, etc., shows risk benefit of the vaccines is negative.

This preprint paper, Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials, was written by a team of highly credible authors and is now undergoing peer review. It points out that the vaccines carry more risk than benefit.

Tennessee is following the data! The House of Representatives Jason Zachary has questions about the data from the trial of children which were used to justify FDA approval of the Covid-19 vaccination for children four years to 6 months old.
Why did only two-thirds of the 4,526 children recruited by the FDA not complete the trial? Was their data thrown out to fit a pre-determined conclusion?
Why was the trial not able to show a reduction in severe illness among those vaccinated?
The FDA's own risk benefit assessment showed a 30% increased chance of contracting Covid-19 in children vaccinated after the first dose compared to those in the placebo group. Why was this overlooked?
Why was approval granted when the manufacturer's own trials show zero benefit to children?
Why was authorization granted by the FDA when there is no data related to the long-term impact of the mRNA vaccine on children who are not risk of serious illness or death, unless they are significantly immune compromised?

WAR against HUMANITY